Maps workspace_storage_exhausted to the reclaim action, so a build that failed
on a full workspace volume is remediated rather than escalated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The three categories now appear in the deployment next to the action
allowlist, and the monitor prints both at the policy gate so the difference is
visible during a demo rather than asserted: two ids Ariadne may execute on its
own authority, three categories it may only ask Hermes to propose a patch for.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Several stages assumed the fixture job. On a code-demo run they would have
read the fixture ConfigMap, which is unrelated to that job, and asserted that
a field changing from unhealthy to healthy was the repair - flatly false when
the outcome is a pull request. The route stage would also have claimed the
source-proposal branch was not taken during the run that takes it.
The stages now branch on the job: the route explains that a source fix is not
a registered action and so takes the proposal branch; the response points at
the pull request recorded on the incident; and the verify stage says the
branch build validates the proposal and that nothing merges without a human
whatever it reports.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gitea wedged at 2073Mi against a 2Gi limit: its API stopped answering even on
its own loopback, and the repeated SSH LoginGraceTime drops in its log were
starvation symptoms rather than a separate fault. Raised to 3Gi.
The reset command's Gitea calls had no --max-time, so a slow service became an
indefinite hang with no output - the script appeared frozen after 'clearing
bstein/hermes-code-demo'. They now fail after 25 seconds and say so.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Five corrections to how the monitor explains itself, plus code-demo support.
The authorization is now described as what it is: a match between an action
Ariadne already has code to perform, an action id Hermes is permitted to
request, and the action Hermes actually recommended. Hermes cannot add to that
registry, and the recommendation proceeds only because it names something
already in it. The editorial line about pull requests is gone.
The repair now reads as a change rather than a value: the field said unhealthy
when the build failed and says healthy because Ariadne just patched it.
The rebuild stage says plainly that the operational branch is complete and
that neither the human-required response nor the optional source proposal is
entered, rather than leaving the reader to infer it from silence.
Inspectable outputs states that on the chart it is the 'records and artifacts'
edge out of the whole response box, not out of one branch - every path ends
there. The layout makes it look like it belongs to the proposal path alone.
follows hermes-code-demo, which takes the proposal branch: the
stages now read as a patch proposal and a pull request instead of being
mislabelled an escalation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The bundle stage printed the job allowlist, which says nothing about what was
actually sent. It now samples the bundle itself, rebuilt with the same
collector Ariadne used - durable, because a finished build's console does not
change - and trimmed hard, since the point is to show what each source
contributes rather than to reprint it:
jenkins.console_failures : 1 region(s), truncated=False
| ERROR: Demo fixture check failed for incident hermes-triage-demo/34
jenkins.failed_tests : 0
log_evidence.records : 35 from OpenSearch kube-*
| [jenkins] Using /home/jenkins/agent/remoting as a remoting work directory
The diagnosis now also carries run_id and run_seconds, so the run can be
opened in the Hermes dashboard to see the prompt it was given and every tool
call it made - the request, not just the answer.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The detection stage read the fixture ConfigMap, which is a live value. Every
stage describes a moment that has passed, and by the time detection is
narrated the repair has already run - so it printed 'healthy' and implied the
fixture had never failed, contradicting the premise of the whole run. Replay
made it certain rather than occasional.
It now prints the incident's recorded state changes, which stay true
afterwards:
21:48:03 detected {result: FAILURE, ...}
21:48:18 diagnosed {classification: known_demo_fixture_failure, ...}
21:48:18 repairing {action: repair_demo_fixture}
21:48:18 awaiting_rebuild {repair: configmap_patch, ...}
21:49:03 resolved {resolved_by_build: 35}
The fixture read stays on the response stage, where healthy is the point.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Hermes stage proved only that a pod was running, when the substantive
evidence is the JSON Hermes returned; it now reads that from the audit trail,
so classification, confidence and requested action are on screen. The policy
gates stage never showed the verdict it was describing; authorized and
authorize_reason now appear with it.
The chart paths were paraphrases. They are now the node labels from
mermaid/TestAutomation.mmd verbatim - Response check, Scoped repair guard,
Action authorizer, Action registry, Scoped ConfigMap repair, Action result -
so a line on screen can be found on the diagram. The checklist carries them too.
The Optional source proposal branch was silently absent rather than explained.
The route stage now states it was not taken and why: a fixture repair is an
operational action, and source fixes are not actions at all.
Also widened the log window and its timeout; the fetch occasionally exceeded
25s and dropped a poll.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
It read only the newest tick from a --tail=400 window. Ariadne now emits
roughly two hundred lines per tick, so that window held about two ticks, and a
step that lasted a single tick - the repair, most importantly - vanished if a
poll landed after it. Build 30 was triaged, repaired and resolved correctly
while the monitor printed nothing at all.
The window is now time-based, and every tick inside it is replayed rather than
just the last. mark() was already idempotent, so replaying is safe and the
monitor recovers stages it was not running for.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The fixture check waited on the Job's .status.succeeded/.status.failed. The
kubelet records a container's exit code the instant it stops, but the Job
controller reconciles those fields on its own schedule: observed at 2m24s,
4m27s and 34m on this cluster for identical work. During that window the pod
had already exited 1 and the build sat printing 'Will try again after 13 sec',
looking hung long after the test had finished, which is unusable in a demo.
Polling the pod's terminated exitCode removes the controller from the path
entirely. The Job is still used, so the evidence shape is unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An audience watching a dashboard has to take the result on trust. Watching
kubectl run against the cluster and reading the raw answer is the difference
between a demonstration and an assertion, so every read is now printed before
it runs and its output shown beneath.
Each stage also names the service UI worth looking at when something changes
there: the Jenkins job as the build goes red and again when the rebuild starts
on its own, the Hermes dashboard as the agent run appears, the Grafana triage
panels and the filed issues at the end.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An audience following mermaid/TestAutomation.mmd needs to know which edge off
the route diamond was taken, which was the one thing the output left them to
infer. It now quotes the chart's own labels - authorized action, human
required, and the optional code path - and the docstring states where the
reporting is coarser than the diagram.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A rerun should start from nothing. DEMO_REPOS is the entire blast radius and
is deliberately explicit: a real service's issues are genuine triage records,
and clearing them to tidy a demo would destroy the evidence the system exists
to produce.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The resolving tick remains the newest one until another incident opens, so the
completed checklist reprinted on every poll.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
reset restores only what the demo itself creates: the fixture ConfigMap, the
demo repository's open repair pull requests and their branches. Real service
repositories are deliberately untouched - those issues are genuine triage
records, and deleting them to tidy a demo would destroy the evidence the
system exists to produce.
monitor streams the flow in the stages of mermaid/TestAutomation.mmd, so a
second terminal can be followed against the chart: Detect and gather, Hermes
analysis, Ariadne policy gates, Ariadne response, Inspectable outputs. Each
stage prints the evidence that moved it, since the claim the chart makes is
that every step is answerable from data rather than asserted. Read-only.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The allowlist is the outermost safety boundary - a job absent from it is never
touched, whatever fails - so it is worth reading at a glance rather than as a
comma-separated setting value echoed verbatim.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The script demanded JENKINS_USER and JENKINS_TOKEN in the environment and said
only 'set JENKINS_USER' when they were missing, which is not enough to act on.
It now sources scripts/ops/hermes_triage_demo.env, git-ignored so it can hold
real tokens, and names that file when credentials are absent. An example file
records what belongs in it.
The fixture command also still polled for a hermes-demo-repair-<build> Job.
That Job stopped existing when the repair became an in-process ConfigMap
patch, so the command would have waited its full 400 seconds and then reported
nothing. It now watches the fixture returning to healthy, which is what
actually happens.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
START-HERE.md is visible in the Hermes dashboard, so its wording is part of
what an operator sees. Describing the runbook as a five-minute demonstration
frames the automation as a set piece rather than as something that runs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ananke, pegasus and atlasbot were triaged but mapped to no repository, so
their failures could produce neither an issue nor a pull request. All three
exist on main and are non-empty. data-prepper is deliberately absent: it has
no repository under bstein.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The agent init container is appended by default, so init-config ran before
/vault/secrets existed and fell back to the Secret every time. The values were
identical, so the migration appeared to work while Vault was never actually
read.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Claude subscription OAuth token was created as a manual kubectl Secret in
the interest of demo time, with migration to Vault agreed as follow-up. The
value now lives at kv/atlas/hermes/agent-tokens and is injected as a file.
The hermes role gains that path and binds the hermes-triage service account
the deployment actually runs as; it previously bound only hermes-vault. The
init container prefers the Vault file and falls back to the Secret, so this
can be rolled back by removing the annotations alone, and the Secret should be
deleted once Vault has been serving it for a while.
Vault was reachable all along without the operator credential: Ariadne already
holds a vault-admin Kubernetes auth role, which is how the value was written.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
