docs(hermes): ground OpenClaw history in retained evidence
This commit is contained in:
parent
96edd28b53
commit
ef75c66314
@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ student commits to a finding.
|
||||
## Validate claims honestly
|
||||
|
||||
Use the claim audit in `references/mastery-rubric.md`. Current configuration and
|
||||
live demonstrations can support current-use claims. They cannot prove that
|
||||
OpenClaw previously ran or was replaced; require Git history, retained manifests,
|
||||
or other evidence before treating that historical claim as demonstrated.
|
||||
live demonstrations support current-use claims. The retained Git history and
|
||||
bound OpenClaw PVC support the deployment/replacement history; require Brad to
|
||||
inspect that evidence and distinguish it from proof of every past interaction.
|
||||
|
||||
End every session with:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -49,6 +49,23 @@ kubectl -n hermes-chat get deploy hermes-chat -o wide
|
||||
|
||||
Do not change the GPU owner as part of a lesson.
|
||||
|
||||
## Retained OpenClaw replacement evidence
|
||||
|
||||
OpenClaw is not part of the current inference path, but its deployment history
|
||||
is retained:
|
||||
|
||||
- `1bc58e10` added the OpenClaw testing-triage workspace, workload, model,
|
||||
ingress, RBAC, and storage.
|
||||
- follow-up commits wired local diagnosis, OIDC, persistence, and the gateway.
|
||||
- `97ecb36b` replaced OpenClaw with Hermes and moved the agent-facing resources.
|
||||
- `bb5e286f` decoupled Hermes from the retired OpenClaw Flux dependency.
|
||||
- the `openclaw-home` PVC remains bound as retained state while no OpenClaw
|
||||
workload is running.
|
||||
|
||||
Have Brad verify the commits and live resource shape. This establishes the
|
||||
cluster deployment and replacement sequence; Brad's direct experience remains
|
||||
the evidence for how he personally used the old agent.
|
||||
|
||||
## Operator evidence path
|
||||
|
||||
The operator role is designed for supervised test-failure triage:
|
||||
|
||||
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ different real incidents and improved a workflow based on what failed.
|
||||
| Access starts read-only and scoped | RBAC, NetworkPolicy, separate identities and state | Produce and explain the allow/deny matrix from live authorization checks. |
|
||||
| Human approval protects changes | Approval config, deny patterns, Flux workflow | Identify every mutation in a proposed incident response and stop before it. |
|
||||
| Local GPU gracefully yields to gaming | Owner state, model gate, fallback | Explain or observe a Wolf ownership window and verify continued fallback service. |
|
||||
| OpenClaw previously ran and was replaced | Not established by the current Hermes deployment | Show retained Git history/manifests/logs or qualify the statement as recollection. |
|
||||
| OpenClaw previously ran and was replaced | `1bc58e10` deploys the OpenClaw triage stack; follow-up commits add gateway/OIDC/persistence; `97ecb36b` replaces it with Hermes; `bb5e286f` retires the dependency; the bound `openclaw-home` PVC remains without a workload | Inspect the commits and live Flux/PVC state, then explain what they prove versus what depends on Brad's personal recollection. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Triage answer scoring
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
|
||||
# Atlas two-hour proof sprint
|
||||
|
||||
The sprint establishes usable, defensible evidence for the current Hermes
|
||||
claims. It does not award mastery and it cannot retroactively prove historical
|
||||
OpenClaw use. Brad performs the work; Hermes gives one task at a time, checks
|
||||
the evidence, and withholds later answers until Brad commits to a result.
|
||||
claims. It does not award mastery. Retained Git and PVC evidence establishes
|
||||
the OpenClaw deployment/replacement sequence; Brad's direct experience remains
|
||||
the evidence for how he personally used it. Brad performs the work; Hermes
|
||||
gives one task at a time, checks the evidence, and withholds later answers until
|
||||
Brad commits to a result.
|
||||
|
||||
## 0–15 minutes — control surface and request path
|
||||
|
||||
@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ and show a passing and adversarial evaluation.
|
||||
pipeline trigger, Flux reconcile, credential/environment change, or manual
|
||||
backfill.
|
||||
3. Audit the interview answer sentence by sentence using `mastery-rubric.md`.
|
||||
Include the retained OpenClaw commits and live PVC/no-workload state.
|
||||
4. Offer to record progress only after Brad approves the write.
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum honest outcome:
|
||||
@ -78,5 +81,5 @@ Minimum honest outcome:
|
||||
- the established Atlas automation path and read-only boundary are explained;
|
||||
- one reusable writable skill is created, tested, and improved by Brad;
|
||||
- autonomous production mutation is not claimed;
|
||||
- historical OpenClaw replacement remains unproven unless independent retained
|
||||
evidence is produced.
|
||||
- historical OpenClaw deployment and replacement are supported by retained Git
|
||||
and PVC evidence, with personal-use details identified as Brad's testimony.
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user