docs(hermes): ground OpenClaw history in retained evidence

This commit is contained in:
jenkins 2026-08-02 04:12:07 -03:00
parent 96edd28b53
commit ef75c66314
4 changed files with 29 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ student commits to a finding.
## Validate claims honestly
Use the claim audit in `references/mastery-rubric.md`. Current configuration and
live demonstrations can support current-use claims. They cannot prove that
OpenClaw previously ran or was replaced; require Git history, retained manifests,
or other evidence before treating that historical claim as demonstrated.
live demonstrations support current-use claims. The retained Git history and
bound OpenClaw PVC support the deployment/replacement history; require Brad to
inspect that evidence and distinguish it from proof of every past interaction.
End every session with:

View File

@ -49,6 +49,23 @@ kubectl -n hermes-chat get deploy hermes-chat -o wide
Do not change the GPU owner as part of a lesson.
## Retained OpenClaw replacement evidence
OpenClaw is not part of the current inference path, but its deployment history
is retained:
- `1bc58e10` added the OpenClaw testing-triage workspace, workload, model,
ingress, RBAC, and storage.
- follow-up commits wired local diagnosis, OIDC, persistence, and the gateway.
- `97ecb36b` replaced OpenClaw with Hermes and moved the agent-facing resources.
- `bb5e286f` decoupled Hermes from the retired OpenClaw Flux dependency.
- the `openclaw-home` PVC remains bound as retained state while no OpenClaw
workload is running.
Have Brad verify the commits and live resource shape. This establishes the
cluster deployment and replacement sequence; Brad's direct experience remains
the evidence for how he personally used the old agent.
## Operator evidence path
The operator role is designed for supervised test-failure triage:

View File

@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ different real incidents and improved a workflow based on what failed.
| Access starts read-only and scoped | RBAC, NetworkPolicy, separate identities and state | Produce and explain the allow/deny matrix from live authorization checks. |
| Human approval protects changes | Approval config, deny patterns, Flux workflow | Identify every mutation in a proposed incident response and stop before it. |
| Local GPU gracefully yields to gaming | Owner state, model gate, fallback | Explain or observe a Wolf ownership window and verify continued fallback service. |
| OpenClaw previously ran and was replaced | Not established by the current Hermes deployment | Show retained Git history/manifests/logs or qualify the statement as recollection. |
| OpenClaw previously ran and was replaced | `1bc58e10` deploys the OpenClaw triage stack; follow-up commits add gateway/OIDC/persistence; `97ecb36b` replaces it with Hermes; `bb5e286f` retires the dependency; the bound `openclaw-home` PVC remains without a workload | Inspect the commits and live Flux/PVC state, then explain what they prove versus what depends on Brad's personal recollection. |
## Triage answer scoring

View File

@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
# Atlas two-hour proof sprint
The sprint establishes usable, defensible evidence for the current Hermes
claims. It does not award mastery and it cannot retroactively prove historical
OpenClaw use. Brad performs the work; Hermes gives one task at a time, checks
the evidence, and withholds later answers until Brad commits to a result.
claims. It does not award mastery. Retained Git and PVC evidence establishes
the OpenClaw deployment/replacement sequence; Brad's direct experience remains
the evidence for how he personally used it. Brad performs the work; Hermes
gives one task at a time, checks the evidence, and withholds later answers until
Brad commits to a result.
## 015 minutes — control surface and request path
@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ and show a passing and adversarial evaluation.
pipeline trigger, Flux reconcile, credential/environment change, or manual
backfill.
3. Audit the interview answer sentence by sentence using `mastery-rubric.md`.
Include the retained OpenClaw commits and live PVC/no-workload state.
4. Offer to record progress only after Brad approves the write.
Minimum honest outcome:
@ -78,5 +81,5 @@ Minimum honest outcome:
- the established Atlas automation path and read-only boundary are explained;
- one reusable writable skill is created, tested, and improved by Brad;
- autonomous production mutation is not claimed;
- historical OpenClaw replacement remains unproven unless independent retained
evidence is produced.
- historical OpenClaw deployment and replacement are supported by retained Git
and PVC evidence, with personal-use details identified as Brad's testimony.