The first advice issues went out rendered through build-failure wording and
were wrong in four places at once: the title printed a source line as a build
number, the header claimed a first failed gate for a build that passed, the
heading asked why a human was needed when nothing had broken, and the
SonarQube link was labelled "Failed build".
Every one of those is small and every one of them is the kind of thing that
makes a reader distrust the rest of the page - which matters more here than
usual, because the whole point of the issue is a suggestion they have to judge
for themselves.
A finding-sourced issue now says what it is: SonarQube reports this rule in
this file, the build is green, this is a standing finding rather than a
failure. Build-failure issues are untouched, and a test asserts each wording
stays out of the other.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
d876c7a6fb